Paid Media
Enterprise B2B lead generation
We coordinated a sharper B2B demand system.
The customer came to us needing Google, LinkedIn, and Meta to serve different B2B buying journeys without losing measurement discipline. We audited the dashboards, separated every unit, and managed each channel against a specific commercial job. In the latest audited year, Google Ads reported 4.80× more primary conversion events on just 5.02% more spend.
- Google Ads
- LinkedIn Ads
- Meta Ads
- GA4 + GTM
Three different B2B buying contexts
Intent, professional targeting, and social demand
Every unit stayed platform-specific
Volume was visible; qualification was not
The problem
Three dashboards. Three meanings of “lead.”
Google recorded conversion actions. LinkedIn and Meta recorded native lead-form results. GA4 recorded repeated form and demo events. Without a shared definition, more volume could still produce less commercial clarity.
Tracking gaps
Product demos, quote requests, contact actions, and partner journeys needed their own signals.
Channel overlap
Search intent, professional audiences, and social discovery could not share one campaign logic.
Quality blindness
Native platforms counted actions, but the supplied analytics did not return MQL, SQL, or opportunity stages.
What a surface dashboard says
“More leads”What the business needs to know
“Which leads become pipeline?”The system
We gave every channel one job.
We did not force three platforms into one playbook. We managed a full-funnel structure that matched channel strength to buyer intent—and matched campaigns to measurable next actions. The supplied files do not establish who first created every historical tag or campaign.
- 01
Audit every signal
We reviewed Google Ads, GA4, GTM, LinkedIn Ads, and Meta Ads before treating any dashboard number as a lead.
- 02
Map the funnel
We separated awareness, consideration, demo, quote, partner, and contact actions so decisions did not collapse into one blended bucket.
- 03
Assign channel roles
We used Google for intent, LinkedIn for professional targeting, and Meta for efficient audience expansion and native forms.
- 04
Feed decisions back
We split campaigns by audience and commercial intent, then shifted budgets, bids, creatives, and landing paths with the evidence.
Create demand
Meta audiences, LinkedIn awareness, video, and creative testing introduced product categories to the right business segments.
Shape consideration
Professional targeting, remarketing, product education, and audience layers moved active accounts toward a demo or inquiry.
Capture intent
High-intent Search, demo forms, quote requests, and partner/contact paths converted demand into measurable actions.
We managed against a granular signal map
Full tag inventory · client name redacted
The evidence
The platforms recorded scale. We kept the definitions honest.
Every figure below stays inside its native platform and reporting window. That makes the result useful for decisions without pretending three attribution systems equal one deduplicated sales pipeline.
INR 2.083M → INR 2.188M
2,357.99 → 11,325.40
INR 883.55 → INR 193.19
447 vs 114 lead-form results
Why we do not call this “4.8× more qualified leads”: Google’s action mix changed materially across the comparison. The latest period contained more granular demo and lead-form actions. The growth is a valid platform-reported change, but no supplied CRM export can separate better performance, better visibility, repeat submissions, or duplicated people.
Google Ads
Capture active demand
11,325.40reported primary conversion events
- Investment / scope
- INR 2.188M spend
- Efficiency lens
- INR 193.19 reported CPA
Apr 1, 2025–Mar 31, 2026. Of these events, 11,311.79 were categorized as lead-form or request-quote actions. They are attributed actions—not deduplicated or qualified people.
Apr 1, 2025–Mar 31, 2026
LinkedIn Ads
Reach enterprise buyers
5,040platform leads in one campaign family
- Investment / scope
- INR 4.393M campaign-family spend
- Efficiency lens
- INR 871.62 blended platform CPL
May 2025–Mar 2026. The structured LinkedIn report records this result for the Evolve Series lead campaign family. No supplied CRM export proves how many became MQLs, SQLs, or opportunities.
Apr 1, 2025–Mar 31, 2026
Meta Ads
Expand SMB and mid-market demand
447lead-form results in one audited campaign
- Investment / scope
- INR 19,191.81 campaign spend
- Efficiency lens
- INR 42.93 per result
Apr 1, 2025–Mar 31, 2026. The Evolve 20 campaign recorded 447 Meta lead-form results versus 114 in the compared year (+292.11%); displayed cost per result fell 9.53%, from INR 47.45 to INR 42.93. These are not CRM-qualified leads.
Apr 1, 2025–Mar 31, 2026
Your next constraint
Do your platforms report leads while sales still questions quality?
We will audit the campaign structure, measurement, funnel, and CRM feedback together. You will leave knowing which number deserves budget—and which number only looks good in a dashboard.