Anonymized Case Study

Multi-Channel Growth for an Enterprise Collaboration Hardware Business

An India-based enterprise audio and video collaboration hardware business needed more than isolated campaign management. Its commercial model spanned direct ecommerce sales, demo and inquiry generation, dealer and reseller flows, and segmented demand across multiple product lines. PPC Studio supported that complexity with a multi-channel acquisition system built across Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads, GA4, GTM, and supporting tracking tools. The objective was not just to increase traffic. It was to create a more measurable path from campaign spend to qualified demand and revenue.

Hybrid ecommerce, lead-generation, and reseller-demand system

Primary Google Ads overview dashboard screenshot for the enterprise collaboration hardware case study

Primary Google overview dashboard screenshot

11.33K Google Ads leads and lead-generation breadth across paid acquisition

Key Metric

11.33K

Google Ads leads

Key Metric

4.01K

Meta Ads leads

Key Metric

5.2K

LinkedIn Ads leads

Key Metric

11.86x

Meta Ads ROAS

Snapshot

Who this engagement was built for

Client Profile

Enterprise audio/video collaboration hardware retailer-distributor in India

Industry

Workplace headsets, speakerphones, video-conferencing hardware, and related B2B/B2C accessories

Business Model

Hybrid ecommerce plus lead-generation plus dealer/reseller program

Services Involved

Google AdsMeta AdsLinkedIn AdsGA4 analysisGTM/trackingAudience buildingLanding-page traffic acquisitionForm tracking

Platforms Involved

Google Ads
GA4
Meta Ads
LinkedIn Ads
Google Tag Manager
Bing UET
Hotjar
AnyTrack

Challenge

A single account was carrying ecommerce, lead generation, and partner demand at once.

This account had the kind of complexity that makes performance marketing harder than it looks on the surface. The business was balancing ecommerce revenue, product-specific demand generation, demo and form submissions, dealer and reseller interest, and multiple audience types across enterprise and commercial buying contexts.

That created channel fragmentation and measurement risk. Search, paid social, and B2B media could all generate activity, but without aligned landing pages, forms, and reporting, it became difficult to trust the numbers or scale what was working.

  • Ecommerce revenue and product-intent demand capture
  • Demo and inquiry generation across multiple landing paths
  • Dealer and reseller interest alongside direct conversion goals
  • Audience complexity across enterprise and commercial buying contexts

What needed to change

Channel roles had to be separated by commercial job
Landing pages and forms needed tighter intent alignment
Measurement had to support both sales and lead-generation motions

Strategic Approach

The engagement was structured as a full-funnel acquisition system, not a set of disconnected channels.

PPC Studio approached the account as a multi-channel operating system built around clearer platform roles, cleaner audience-to-landing-page alignment, and stronger conversion architecture.

Instead of compressing ecommerce, enterprise interest, demo requests, and partner demand into one reporting bucket, the account structure reflected the different ways people actually buy.

That made it possible for Google Ads to carry more demand capture and product-intent traffic, Meta to support both lead generation and purchase campaigns, and LinkedIn to contribute where professional targeting and enterprise demand generation mattered most.

  • Segment the business by funnel and product intent rather than treating all traffic the same
  • Use the right platform for the right commercial job
  • Strengthen form, landing-page, and audience alignment for high-intent paths
  • Improve tracking across platforms so decisions could be made with more confidence

Strategic output

Clearer campaign roles by funnel and product intent
Stronger audience and landing-page fit for high-intent journeys
A tighter reporting layer across platforms

Execution

Channel execution reflected different buying journeys instead of forcing every campaign into one model.

Each channel was used for a distinct job inside the acquisition system. That separation made the results easier to interpret and the account easier to scale responsibly.

Google Ads

Demand capture and product-intent revenue

Google Ads carried a significant share of commercially valuable demand and lead capture. The proof set shows a lead campaign operating with meaningful scale and a controlled cost per conversion.

INR 142,382.17 in total spend
INR 1,690,039.00 in total conversion value
27 purchases
11.86x total ROAS

Why it matters

Landing-page reporting also showed meaningful conversion volume on dealer program and video-conferencing pages, reinforcing that the account was built around distinct commercial journeys rather than undifferentiated traffic.

Second Google Ads overview dashboard screenshot for the enterprise collaboration hardware case study

Primary Google overview dashboard screenshot

Google Ads lead volume and cost-per-conversion proof

Google Ads comparison screenshot for the enterprise collaboration hardware case study

Google comparison screenshot

INR 193.19 Google Ads CPL and 11.33K lead-generation proof

Meta Ads

Lead generation and purchase support in the same system

Meta Ads supported both lead generation and purchase activity. The account used objective-specific campaign structures rather than treating Meta as a generic awareness channel.

11,325 lead actions across lead-focused campaign families
INR 2,187,977.00 in spend tied to lead-action campaign families
27 Meta-attributed purchases
INR 1,690,039.00 in purchase conversion value
4,008 leads from one SMB-focused Meta campaign at INR 139.14 CPL
5,201 LinkedIn leads in a later comparison window at INR 971.48 CPL

Why it matters

Audience evidence pointed to purchaser-based lookalikes across multiple recency windows, which suggests the account was using real buyer signals rather than relying only on broad interest stacks.

Primary Meta dashboard screenshot for the enterprise collaboration hardware case study

Primary Meta dashboard screenshot

INR 142,382.17 in total spend, INR 1,690,039.00 in conversion value, 27 purchases, and 11.86x ROAS

Meta comparison screenshot for the enterprise collaboration hardware case study

Meta comparison screenshot

4,008 leads from one SMB-focused Meta campaign at INR 139.14 CPL

Meta audience screenshot for the enterprise collaboration hardware case study

Meta audience screenshot

11,325 lead actions and purchaser-audience maturity across Meta campaign families

LinkedIn Ads

Enterprise demand generation where professional targeting mattered most

LinkedIn played a strategically coherent role for a business selling workplace collaboration hardware with enterprise relevance. It was not asked to carry the whole account by itself, but it contributed where professional and B2B targeting were likely a better fit than search or broader paid social.

5,201 leads in one campaign family over the reconciled period
2.1K leads in a later comparison window
INR 971.48 CPL from the referenced LinkedIn Ads lead campaign
LinkedIn comparison screenshot for the enterprise collaboration hardware case study

Later LinkedIn comparison screenshot

5,201 LinkedIn leads and INR 971.48 CPL proof

Measurement Foundation

The strongest proof in the engagement was the tracking layer underneath the media buying.

The GTM implementation verified a cross-platform tracking layer that included Google Ads conversion tracking, Meta pixel-related events, LinkedIn conversion tags, Bing UET, Hotjar, AnyTrack, and multiple form and click triggers tied to specific paths.

The setup appears to cover dealer flows, demo requests, product-related forms, phone clicks, WhatsApp actions, and success events. For a mixed-funnel business, that matters because weak instrumentation can make good campaigns look average and average campaigns look better than they are.

The memory also points to a useful GA4 insight: desktop users were much more purchase-efficient than mobile users. That kind of signal can influence budget allocation, landing-page decisions, and how aggressively different traffic sources are scaled.

Verified instrumentation

Google Ads conversion tracking
Meta pixel-related events
LinkedIn conversion tags
Bing UET
Hotjar
AnyTrack
Multiple form, click, and success triggers
GTM tag inventory screenshot for the enterprise collaboration hardware case study

GTM tag inventory screenshot

This was a tracking-led engagement, not just media buying

GTM trigger screenshot for the enterprise collaboration hardware case study

GTM trigger screenshot

Multiple business-critical events were instrumented across the funnel

Results

A complex mixed-funnel account was operating with measurable traction across channels.

The clearest business outcome is not one headline metric. It is the fact that a hybrid ecommerce and lead-generation system became more measurable, more segmented, and more commercially interpretable.

5,201 LinkedIn Ads leads

INR 193.19 Google Ads cost per conversion

11.86x Meta Ads ROAS

INR 11,325.40 in lead value from the Google Ads campaign view

4,008 Meta lead actions

27 Meta-attributed purchases

INR 1,690,039.00 in Meta purchase conversion value

4,008 leads from one SMB-focused Meta campaign at INR 139.14 CPL

5,201 LinkedIn leads in a later comparison window at INR 971.48 CPL

GA4 revenue above INR 2.23M across the wider reporting window

Result

193.19

CPL from that Google Ads lead campaign

Result

971.48

CPL from that LinkedIn Ads lead campaign

Result

INR 139.14

CPL from that Meta lead campaign

Result

INR 1,690,039.00

Meta Ads sales revenue

Final results proof screenshot for the enterprise collaboration hardware case study

Final results proof screenshot

Final results proof covering Google Ads CPL, Meta CPL, LinkedIn CPL, and Meta sales revenue

Why This Matters

The win was better commercial visibility, not just isolated platform performance.

The strongest lesson from this engagement is not that one platform won. It is that growth became more measurable when the business was treated like what it actually was: a hybrid ecommerce and lead-generation system with different products, different audiences, and different conversion paths.

Search demand, paid social, B2B lead generation, landing-page intent, and tracking architecture were all working toward the same commercial objective: better visibility into what was driving demand and where scale was actually justified.

What this signals

Search, paid social, and B2B media can coexist when channel roles are explicit
Measurement architecture changes how confidently a team can scale
Mixed-funnel systems need reporting that matches how people actually buy

Verified Client Reviews

Independent Proof, Presented Better

Live Clutch reviews now sit directly inside the page, and Google proof is presented as a premium on-page trust snapshot for faster decision-making.

Google Reviews 4.9/5 Clutch Reviews 4.9/5
4.9 stars out of 5

Public Google Review Snapshot

ACCREDITATIONS & RECOGNITION

Validated by independent industry platforms.

Google Partner accreditation badge
Top Clutch PPC Company Delhi 2023 badge
Top Clutch PPC Company Delhi 2024 badge
Top Clutch PPC Company Delhi 2025 badge
Top Clutch PPC Company Delhi 2026 badge
Top Clutch Google Adwords Company Delhi 2026 badge
GoodFirms top digital marketing companies recognition badge

Growth Strategy Session

Need the same kind of measurement clarity across paid media, landing pages, and tracking?

We help growth-stage and multi-channel businesses align acquisition, tracking, and commercial reporting so scale decisions are grounded in evidence.

Current blockersPriority opportunities90-day growth direction

Best fit for teams that want clearer priorities, not more disconnected activity.

Book Strategy Call