Paid Media
Anonymized Case Study
Multi-Channel Growth for an Enterprise Collaboration Hardware Business
An India-based enterprise audio and video collaboration hardware business needed more than isolated campaign management. Its commercial model spanned direct ecommerce sales, demo and inquiry generation, dealer and reseller flows, and segmented demand across multiple product lines. PPC Studio supported that complexity with a multi-channel acquisition system built across Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads, GA4, GTM, and supporting tracking tools. The objective was not just to increase traffic. It was to create a more measurable path from campaign spend to qualified demand and revenue.
Hybrid ecommerce, lead-generation, and reseller-demand system
Primary Google overview dashboard screenshot
11.33K Google Ads leads and lead-generation breadth across paid acquisition
Key Metric
11.33K
Google Ads leads
Key Metric
4.01K
Meta Ads leads
Key Metric
5.2K
LinkedIn Ads leads
Key Metric
11.86x
Meta Ads ROAS
Snapshot
Who this engagement was built for
Client Profile
Enterprise audio/video collaboration hardware retailer-distributor in India
Industry
Workplace headsets, speakerphones, video-conferencing hardware, and related B2B/B2C accessories
Business Model
Hybrid ecommerce plus lead-generation plus dealer/reseller program
Services Involved
Platforms Involved
Challenge
A single account was carrying ecommerce, lead generation, and partner demand at once.
This account had the kind of complexity that makes performance marketing harder than it looks on the surface. The business was balancing ecommerce revenue, product-specific demand generation, demo and form submissions, dealer and reseller interest, and multiple audience types across enterprise and commercial buying contexts.
That created channel fragmentation and measurement risk. Search, paid social, and B2B media could all generate activity, but without aligned landing pages, forms, and reporting, it became difficult to trust the numbers or scale what was working.
- Ecommerce revenue and product-intent demand capture
- Demo and inquiry generation across multiple landing paths
- Dealer and reseller interest alongside direct conversion goals
- Audience complexity across enterprise and commercial buying contexts
What needed to change
Strategic Approach
The engagement was structured as a full-funnel acquisition system, not a set of disconnected channels.
PPC Studio approached the account as a multi-channel operating system built around clearer platform roles, cleaner audience-to-landing-page alignment, and stronger conversion architecture.
Instead of compressing ecommerce, enterprise interest, demo requests, and partner demand into one reporting bucket, the account structure reflected the different ways people actually buy.
That made it possible for Google Ads to carry more demand capture and product-intent traffic, Meta to support both lead generation and purchase campaigns, and LinkedIn to contribute where professional targeting and enterprise demand generation mattered most.
- Segment the business by funnel and product intent rather than treating all traffic the same
- Use the right platform for the right commercial job
- Strengthen form, landing-page, and audience alignment for high-intent paths
- Improve tracking across platforms so decisions could be made with more confidence
Strategic output
Execution
Channel execution reflected different buying journeys instead of forcing every campaign into one model.
Each channel was used for a distinct job inside the acquisition system. That separation made the results easier to interpret and the account easier to scale responsibly.
Google Ads
Demand capture and product-intent revenue
Google Ads carried a significant share of commercially valuable demand and lead capture. The proof set shows a lead campaign operating with meaningful scale and a controlled cost per conversion.
Why it matters
Landing-page reporting also showed meaningful conversion volume on dealer program and video-conferencing pages, reinforcing that the account was built around distinct commercial journeys rather than undifferentiated traffic.
Primary Google overview dashboard screenshot
Google Ads lead volume and cost-per-conversion proof
Google comparison screenshot
INR 193.19 Google Ads CPL and 11.33K lead-generation proof
Meta Ads
Lead generation and purchase support in the same system
Meta Ads supported both lead generation and purchase activity. The account used objective-specific campaign structures rather than treating Meta as a generic awareness channel.
Why it matters
Audience evidence pointed to purchaser-based lookalikes across multiple recency windows, which suggests the account was using real buyer signals rather than relying only on broad interest stacks.
Primary Meta dashboard screenshot
INR 142,382.17 in total spend, INR 1,690,039.00 in conversion value, 27 purchases, and 11.86x ROAS
Meta comparison screenshot
4,008 leads from one SMB-focused Meta campaign at INR 139.14 CPL
Meta audience screenshot
11,325 lead actions and purchaser-audience maturity across Meta campaign families
LinkedIn Ads
Enterprise demand generation where professional targeting mattered most
LinkedIn played a strategically coherent role for a business selling workplace collaboration hardware with enterprise relevance. It was not asked to carry the whole account by itself, but it contributed where professional and B2B targeting were likely a better fit than search or broader paid social.
Later LinkedIn comparison screenshot
5,201 LinkedIn leads and INR 971.48 CPL proof
Measurement Foundation
The strongest proof in the engagement was the tracking layer underneath the media buying.
The GTM implementation verified a cross-platform tracking layer that included Google Ads conversion tracking, Meta pixel-related events, LinkedIn conversion tags, Bing UET, Hotjar, AnyTrack, and multiple form and click triggers tied to specific paths.
The setup appears to cover dealer flows, demo requests, product-related forms, phone clicks, WhatsApp actions, and success events. For a mixed-funnel business, that matters because weak instrumentation can make good campaigns look average and average campaigns look better than they are.
The memory also points to a useful GA4 insight: desktop users were much more purchase-efficient than mobile users. That kind of signal can influence budget allocation, landing-page decisions, and how aggressively different traffic sources are scaled.
Verified instrumentation
GTM tag inventory screenshot
This was a tracking-led engagement, not just media buying
GTM trigger screenshot
Multiple business-critical events were instrumented across the funnel
Results
A complex mixed-funnel account was operating with measurable traction across channels.
The clearest business outcome is not one headline metric. It is the fact that a hybrid ecommerce and lead-generation system became more measurable, more segmented, and more commercially interpretable.
5,201 LinkedIn Ads leads
INR 193.19 Google Ads cost per conversion
11.86x Meta Ads ROAS
INR 11,325.40 in lead value from the Google Ads campaign view
4,008 Meta lead actions
27 Meta-attributed purchases
INR 1,690,039.00 in Meta purchase conversion value
4,008 leads from one SMB-focused Meta campaign at INR 139.14 CPL
5,201 LinkedIn leads in a later comparison window at INR 971.48 CPL
GA4 revenue above INR 2.23M across the wider reporting window
Result
193.19
CPL from that Google Ads lead campaign
Result
971.48
CPL from that LinkedIn Ads lead campaign
Result
INR 139.14
CPL from that Meta lead campaign
Result
INR 1,690,039.00
Meta Ads sales revenue
Final results proof screenshot
Final results proof covering Google Ads CPL, Meta CPL, LinkedIn CPL, and Meta sales revenue
Why This Matters
The win was better commercial visibility, not just isolated platform performance.
The strongest lesson from this engagement is not that one platform won. It is that growth became more measurable when the business was treated like what it actually was: a hybrid ecommerce and lead-generation system with different products, different audiences, and different conversion paths.
Search demand, paid social, B2B lead generation, landing-page intent, and tracking architecture were all working toward the same commercial objective: better visibility into what was driving demand and where scale was actually justified.
What this signals
Verified Client Reviews
Independent Proof, Presented Better
Live Clutch reviews now sit directly inside the page, and Google proof is presented as a premium on-page trust snapshot for faster decision-making.
Kiran
7 weeks ago
1 review • 0 photos
★★★★★
We had a very positive experience with PPC Studio. Mr. Subodh was personally involved and reviewed even the smallest details with care.
Leena Guha Roy
27 weeks ago
Local Guide • 11 reviews • 3 photos
★★★★★
Our B2B lead-gen campaigns with PPC Studio have been seamless, creative, and result-oriented.
Gaurav Tandon
32 weeks ago
8 reviews • 7 photos
★★★★★
A young and dynamic group that listens, understands, and delivers at top industry standards.
Meena Khanna
34 weeks ago
1 review • 0 photos
★★★★★
PPC Studio has consistently delivered on commitments and improved our online presence with strong lead quality.
Public Google Review Snapshot
Google Review
★★★★★
ACCREDITATIONS & RECOGNITION
Validated by independent industry platforms.
Growth Strategy Session
Need the same kind of measurement clarity across paid media, landing pages, and tracking?
We help growth-stage and multi-channel businesses align acquisition, tracking, and commercial reporting so scale decisions are grounded in evidence.
Best fit for teams that want clearer priorities, not more disconnected activity.